1| 2| 3| 4| 5| 6| Legal Intake Control | Meridian Intake 7| 8| 9| 10| 11| 12| 13| 14| 15| 16| 17| 18| 19| 20| 21| 22| 23| 24| 25| 26| 27| 28| 29| 30| 31| 32| 33| 34| 35| 36| 37| 50| 51|
52|
53|
54|
55|
Legal intake control
56|

Legal Intake Control

57|

Private intake control for Canadian law firms with missed-inquiry recovery, conflict-aware routing, and strict no-advice boundaries.

58|
LegalHuman-reviewedBoundary-safeReviewable
59| 60|
61|
STATUS: REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE

Representative workflow snapshot

Missed-call event detected
Approved acknowledgement sent
New matter or existing client path chosen
Practice-area fit captured
Province and urgency logged
High-priority matters surfaced for staff review
Out-of-scope inquiry
Polite decline or alternate instruction
Transcript stored for QA
62|
63|
64|
Pain points

Where intake control breaks.

After-hours injury inquiries

High-intent prospects hit voicemail, generic callbacks, or unlogged inboxes.

Weak qualification

Staff spend time on poor-fit matters before basic jurisdiction, service line, or urgency are captured.

No reviewable proof

Partners cannot see which inquiries were recovered, declined, or escalated.

What Meridian captures

Operational detail without crossing professional boundaries.

  • Caller name and contact path
  • Practice-area fit and geography
  • Urgency signal and callback window
  • Consent-aware messaging preferences
  • Transcript log for staff review
What Meridian never does
  • No legal advice
  • No case-merit determination
  • No conflict clearance
  • No representation statements
  • No deadline advice
Routing examples

Reviewable routing logic.

Possible limitation issue
Human review required
Route to client-approved urgent review queue
Request for legal advice by text
Boundary block
State that advice cannot be provided through intake automation
Existing client operational request
Non-new-matter handling
Send ... [truncated] 65|
66|
Request Private Intake Review
67|

Start with a controlled fit review.

68|

Meridian reviews missed-inquiry handling, response discipline, routing, boundary language, and leadership visibility before recommending a deployment path.

69|
Sensitive-data warning: Do not send medical records, legal strategy, payment card data, passwords, emergency requests, confidential documents, or clinical details through this public form. No attorney-client relationship is formed through this inquiry.
70|
71| 72| 73| 74| 75| 76|
77|
78|
79|
80|
81|
82|
83|
84|
85|
86|

Where SMS is used after deployment, Meridian is designed around client-approved consent rules and STOP / opt-out handling.

87| 88|
89|
90|
91|

FAQ

Does Meridian give legal advice?

No. Meridian is designed around intake capture, qualification, and routing. The client firm remains responsible for legal judgment and professional obligations.

Can Meridian tell a prospect whether they have a case?

No. Meridian can capture intake facts and route the inquiry, but it does not determine case merit or representation.

What proof does leadership get?

Transcript QA, routing logs, and monthly leadership reporting showing what was recovered, escalated, or declined.

92| 93| 100| 101| 102| 103| 104|